Tel. +44 (0)20 7287 4414
Email. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Tel. +44 (0)20 7287 4414
Email. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The Bruges Group spearheaded the intellectual battle to win a vote to leave the European Union and, above all, against the emergence of a centralised EU state.
The Bruges Group spearheaded the intellectual battle to win a vote to leave the European Union and, above all, against the emergence of a centralised EU state.
Image
Image
Image
Image

Technology Sovereignty

united-3026204_1920

 Economic victory in a free trade world will always go to the strongest economy – and the disparity is growing.


Against this a new concept has emerged: technology sovereignty. This recognises that IT infrastructure lies at the heart of a modern society. And it's about far more than access to broadband.


Networked computers are not only essential for defence. They also run our transport systems, our power grids, satellites, weather forecasting, and communications of all kinds. That matters to Britain, of course, as it does to all countries. It matters as well because Britain's industrial future is closely linked with the production of all manner of products essential to these systems.


Tech entrepreneur Herman Hauser laid out his preconditions for technology sovereignty in a letter to the House of Commons Foreign Affairs committee about the proposed takeover of Cambridge chip design company ARM Holdings. Britain has to have the key technologies to run a modern country, or guaranteed access to them for at least five years (by which time the technology will probably be outdated).


Some say that it doesn't matter whether a company is British or American, or Chinese. But that is to ignore intellectual property – the patents and ideas that drive technological progress. Foreign ownership of British companies will mean that research departments and production jobs will increasingly go abroad as well. Like political sovereignty, technology sovereignty matters to the British people. Without technology sovereignty, Britain's IT infrastructure could be held to ransom by foreign governments or companies. In particular, Britain could become squeezed in the growing confrontation between China and the USA.


This is precisely the issue raised in 2019 by the former First Sea Lord Admiral Lord West in relation to the takeover of Cobham by US venture capital firm Advent. Unfortunately, Boris Johnson has taken the side of the market against technology sovereignty, saying, "I think it's very important that we should have an open and dynamic market economy."


In July this year, the Prime Minister announced that he was referring the proposed takeover of Newport Wafer Fab, the country's biggest computer chip maker, on grounds of national security. He has been urged to do likewise with the ARM Holdings takeover.


But it's not immensely reassuring that the Newport Wafer Fab referral is to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. The parliamentary committee conducting its inquiry into the takeover will almost certainly not have access to top secret information. That rules out any scrutiny of anything involving national security.


That's bad enough. But it's not just national security at stake. The USA takes an aggressive view on technology. Its regulations are likely to prevent British companies owned in the USA from exporting advanced technology products without permission from the White House. China too is developing its own export regulations, broadly mirroring the USA's.


The iron laws of economics, rather than flattening out the mythical playing field, force stronger companies to seek to become even more dominant. Especially when combined with rivalries. If you want to see that process in action, look at the current wave of attempted buyouts of technology and defence companies by US and Chinese concerns. These companies all have one thing in common: they are developing technology vital to the security of the country and vital, too, to its industrial future.


Last year, the Commons defence committee published a submission from the trade union Unite on 'sovereign capability' calling on the government to generate a list of technologies that need to be secured to give Britain freedom of action without the intervention of other countries. That is a crucial demand. Companies should be putting forward their own lists of these key technologies.

Nightclubs: The Latest Casualty in the Government’...
Zero Carbon?

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to https://www.brugesgroup.com/

Copyright ©1989-2021 The Bruges Group. All Rights Reserved.
Site designed by WA Designs