The Bruges Group spearheads the intellectual battle against the notion of "ever-closer Union" in Europe and, above all, against British involvement in a single European state.

Taxation without representation

The Marks and Spencer Case: EU forces changes to British tax law

Robert Oulds 

        

        Press Release
        For Immediate Release
        EU forces changes to British tax law

THE MARKS & SPENCER CASE
The European Court of Justice and Taxation

Today the ECJ ruled on British tax law. The long awaited judgement from the unaccountable ECJ could cost the British taxpayer billions of Pounds. The fact that the EU has overturned UK tax law shows that Blair’s famous red-line, which he claimed he secured when the EU Constitution was being drafted, was in fact a red-herring. British governments had already surrendered the UK’s right to determine about 20% of this country’s taxation.

The Bruges Group have been warning the Government for many years as to what might happen. Now Blair and Brown will learn, but this will be a lesson learnt at the taxpayers cost.

The decision today shows that the EU has usurped the right to make UK tax laws. The ECJ has struck-out well-established UK rules in pursuing the Brussels goal of tax harmonisation. This will cause uncertainty for business and government funding. The government has known about this risk since at least 1999, and should now act to bring back control of the UK’s tax affairs.

Chillingly the ECJ has ruled that,
"The Court reiterates, first of all, that although direct taxation is within the competence of the Member States, the latter must exercise that competence with respect for Community law."

The treasury has so far refused to reveal the extent of the costs of this judgement.

Other areas of UK tax law under assault from the EU are:

  • overseas dividends,
  • transfer pricing,
  • anti tax-haven legislation (Controlled Foreign Company tax),
  • taxation deducted from savings income (Withholding tax),
  • the rules governing the use of tax losses belonging to one UK company to other companies in the same group (Group relief),
  • rules that prevent overseas owned companies getting UK tax relief for excessive interest payments to their parent, (Thin Capitalisation).
Areas already under the control of the EU are:
  • VAT
  • ,
  • where tax is triggered when people seek to move assets offshore and would otherwise be able to dispose of them tax-free,
  • taxation of dividend income received from overseas companies,
  • and those laws that prevent UK subsidiaries of groups based in other EU states obtaining tax relief for artificially large interest payments on loans from their Parent Companies.

Robert Oulds, Director of the Bruges Group says,

"It is wrong that the unelected ECJ controls much of British tax law. The American colonies revolted for less, whatever happened to ‘No taxation without representation’.

"Gordon Brown must be incensed. The European Court of Justice will cost the British taxpayer an untold sum and force Gordon Brown to raise taxes to fund his budget deficit.

"Combining this with other cases due to be considered by the ECJ, most notably the Cadbury Schweppes case, and the potential of Britain loosing the budget rebate means that there will be a serious black hole in the nation’s finances.

"The EU destroyed the Conservative’s reputation for economic competence when the Pound fell out of the exchange rate mechanism. It seems that the EU will destroy Labour’s reputation for financial prudence."


- ENDS -

-------------------------------------------------------------

Notes for Editors

Click here to obtain full details of the ECJ's ruling

Current British tax law
Group Relief is available between companies that are either UK resident or have a branch subject to corporation tax in the UK, and which are under 75% common ownership.

Group relief works by the company with losses surrendering them to the company with profits, who then uses those losses to reduce their own corporate tax bill.

This law has been in existence in the UK since the 1960s at the latest.

Case history
The Marks and Spencer v Halsey case arose from M&S seeking to surrender losses of French, Belgian and German companies against the profits of their UK companies for years in the mid-90s. M&S are unable to do this under UK statute but are claiming under Article 43 (Freedom of Establishment) and Article 56 (Freedom of Capital) that the rules that prevent them doing so are discrimination under the EU Treaty, as it favours the establishment of business and capital in the UK rather than in other member states. Tax laws that are so discriminatory are then regarded as invalid under the law of the relevant Member State.

1. Today’s judgement follows a line of cases held by the European Court of Justice since the 1999 case of ICI v Colmar. These cases, taken from many Member States, potentially strike out direct tax provisions including transfer pricing, controlled foreign company, group relief, thin capitalisation, taxation of dividend income, payments into pension schemes and migration, and effectively this judicial law-making is forcing member-states to have a common tax base.

2. The M&S case was originally heard at the Special Commissioners in 2003, where the court held in the Inland Revenue’s favour, on the basis that the difference in treatment of overseas subsidiaries, was a difference, and that not every difference was necessarily discriminatory, eg in M&S' case there was a corresponding benefit to the disadvantage in that the overseas subsidiaries’ profits would not be taxed. M&S appealed to the High Court, who referred the matter to the ECJ as it required an interpretation of unclear European law. The Advocate General opined in M&S’s favour in Spring 2005.

3. No-one, with the exception of HM Treasury and government ministers, knows the quantum of UK tax at stake in respect of all the EU cases, Accountancy Age estimated it to be approximately £20 billlion. Tax refunded in respect of prior years will also include interest due to the taxpayer from the time when the tax payment for the relevant year fell due.

4. HM Treasury has constantly refused to answer the question when tabled in the House of Parliament, the reasons given including that it may be prejudicial to relations with multinational bodies, and it would increase the cost of government debt.

5. UK tax law is also under assault from corporates taking the government to the ECJ in respect of transfer pricing, taxation of overseas dividends, controlled foreign company rules (UK anti-tax haven laws), tax credits on pre-1997 dividends paid from non-UK EU companies, overseas leasing.

6. UK corporates have claimed back tax paid in previous years on the basis that the existing taxing provisions of UK law were contrary to the EU treaty. These claims are thought to go back as far as 1973, but most start in the mid-1990s.

7. The government has known about the risk of these cases following the related case of ICI v Colmar in 1999, and has failed in subject Treaty renegotiations and the EU Constitution to confirm that EU authority does not extend to direct tax laws of Member States. The government has sought to introduce measures to limit how far back legitimate claims can be made, some of which may also be illegal under EU law.

8. The government has been forced to change transfer pricing rules (Introduction of UK-UK transfer pricing in 2004) to fit with the ECJ’s decisions, causing a considerable administrative strain on business. Other member states have changed their transfer pricing rules so they do not apply to intra-EU transactions.

9. In PBR 2005 on 5 December 2005 confirmed that both the Film Tax Credit and Leasing corporate taxation rules will be changed. The government gave almost no attention to the fact that both these changes have come about in order to fit UK tax law within EU rules.

10. The European Commission has a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base Working Group, presently seeking to determine and implement a Common Consolidated Tax Base across the EU.

-------------------------------------------------------------

For further information contact:

Robert Oulds
Director
The Bruges Group
216 Linen Hall, 162-168 Regent Street, London W1B 5TB
UK

Tel: +44(0) 20 7287 4414
Fax: +44(0) 20 7287 5522
Mobile: 0774 002 9787
E-mail: info@brugesgroup.com

-------------------------------------------------------------


NEWSLETTER
 

Sign up for our mailing
list and receive our
latest news, comment
and events.


The Single Market is the problem
Response to the Prime Minister's speech on the EU

Monday, 4th October 2010
Why the election pledges must be honoured
Roger Helmer MEP 
Melanie Phillips 

Press Release
MEPs should reject Baroness Cathy Ashton
Gerard Batten MEP 

The EU and its attack on Britain’s most successful industry
The City of London Under Threat
Professor Tim Congdon 

EU court ruling shames Ken Clarke
Taxpayers to lose £9.7 billion

Press Release
Does the EU have anything to fear from Cameron?
Barry Legg 

Press Release
Cameron is breaking his pledge to hold a Lisbon referendum
Barry Legg 

Monday, 5th October 2009
Are the political parties failing the voters of Britain?
Simon Heffer 
Peter Hitchens 
Barry Legg 

Mission Accomplished
Bruges Group wins battle to divorce Conservatives from the EPP
Robert Oulds 
Dr Lee Rotherham 

Adieu-EPP
Cameron must fulfil long overdue pledge
Robert Oulds 

Sir Andrew Green's latest findings on immigration
Immigration: The Impact of the EU
Sir Andrew Green KCMG 

Thursday, 30th April 2009
The EU and what the Conservatives should be doing about it
Fraser Nelson 
Stuart Wheeler 

David Cameron, political palaeontology and digging-up the old dinosaur Ken Clarke
Comment on the return of Ken Clarke
Barry Legg 

EU recovery plan costs UK £25 billion
The EU’s Credibility Crunch: Creator of economic downturn, Impediment to recovery
Damon Lambert 

£106,117 Per Minute Scandal
How much does the European Union cost Britain? 2008
Gerard Batten MEP 

Norman Tebbit and the Czech President Speak Out Against EU Centralisation
Dinner in the Presence of Baroness Thatcher
President Václav Klaus 
The Rt. Hon Lord Tebbit of Chingford, CH, PC 
The Rt Hon. Baroness Thatcher LG, OM, FRS 

Corporate Tax Threat to the Economy
Costly, Complex and Counterproductive: The Case Against a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base
Damon Lambert 

Remembering Margaret Thatcher's Seminal Speech
20th Anniversary of the Bruges Speech
Robert Oulds 

Submitting to authority dressed as virtue
Are the British a Servile People? Idealism and the EU
Robert Oulds 

Rejecting the re-heated EU Constitution
Welcoming the Irish No Vote
Robert Oulds 

The radical changes needed if we are to survive as a free people
The Costs of Regulation and How the EU Makes Them Worse
Robert Oulds 

Referendum amendment vote
Press Release: Politicians are fuelling distrust
Robert Oulds 

Saturday, 17th November 2007
2007 Conference
Gerard Batten MEP 
Christopher Booker 
Bernard Connolly 
Dr Anthony Coughlan 
Marc Glendening 
Roger Helmer MEP 
Martin Howe QC 
Ruth Lea 
Cllr Steve Radford 
The Rt Hon. John Redwood MP 

Sequels are never as good
Miliband's 'Bruges' Speech: Rebutted
Robert Oulds 

Fraud, Mismanagement and Waste
Analysis of the European Court of Auditors Report
Dr Lee Rotherham 

How to become a good neighbour
The EU Constitution: Context and Predictions
Robert Oulds 
Dr Lee Rotherham 

New EU Constitution Threat to British Jobs
The Economic Implications of the Revived and Renamed EU Constitution
Robert Oulds 

New EU Constitution Threat to UK Border Control
Immigration, Asylum and the Revived EU Constitution
Robert Oulds 

The EU Constitution - Returns
The Revived EU Constitution Breaches the Justice and Home Affairs Red Line
Robert Oulds 

Fighting to make sure Labour keep their promise
The Bruges Group calls on the Conservative Party to stand firm
Robert Oulds 

EU costing Britain £60.1 billion per year
How much does the European Union cost Britain? 2007
Gerard Batten MEP 

Brown must repudiate the agreement
European Council usurps powers of governments
Dr Helen Szamuely 

Blair's 10 years of handing power to the EU
Reform Treaty to revive EU Constitution
Robert Oulds 

Celebrating 300 years of Union
In advance of the Scottish Elections Lord Tebbit speaks up for the Union

Developing policies for a post-EU Britain
Bruges Group Conference

Fraud, mismanagement and waste
EU Unfit for Purpose: So EU Court of Auditors report indicates

It would burst the Cameron bubble for good
No time to back down over the EPP misalliance
Dr Lee Rotherham 

The NHS becomes open to EU control
The Yvonne Watts Case: EU encroaches on health care
Robert Oulds 

EU Advocate General's decision to cost the UK £7 BILLION in lost tax revenue
Another Hole in British Tax Sovereignty

EU encroaches on the NHS
The Yvonne Watts Case: The EU and Health Care
Robert Oulds 

Taxation without representation
The Marks and Spencer Case: EU forces changes to British tax law
Robert Oulds 

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery
Logo embarrassment for Government
The Rt Hon. Lord Lamont of Lerwick 

Paper launch and petition to the PM
Plan B For Europe: Lost Opportunities in the EU Constitution Debate and the petition to Tony Blair

A referendum should still be held
Photo opportunity: Petition to No. 10 Downing Street

Time for a national debate on the EU
Comment on Jack Straw's Referendum statement

No means No
Lord Lamont comments on the French Referendum and the EU Constitution
The Rt Hon. Lord Lamont of Lerwick 

EU issue deprived Conservatives of 27 seats
Election analysis: The effect of UKIP/Veritas
Dr Richard North 

After 5th May the real decisions will have to be made
The election issue should be Who Governs Britain?
Robert Oulds 

Policy Proposals
The Bottom Line

Fight for Britain to be freed from the EU
The Bruges Group will fight for a no vote

The Implications of the ECJ Judgement on the Stability and Growth Pact
Court Decision Reveals EU Power Vacuum to be Filled by the EU Constitution

The EU's threat to global stability
Galileo: The Military and Political Dimensions

The emasculation of the nation-state
The end of Britain's independent economic policy

EU expansion: a step back for Eastern Europe
Welcoming the ten accession states

Tony Blair, bring on the referendum
The EU Constitution: Threat or Opportunity?

Jack Straw returns to his roots
Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, threatens the European Court of Justice with the UK's withdrawal from the European Union
Robert Oulds 

Health and the Nation
The EU threatens the UK's right to run and reform health care

The EU's threat to Britain's competitiveness
The Economic Consequences of the EU Constitution
The Rt Hon. Oliver Letwin MP 

The Bruges Group continues to expose the proposed EU Constitution: Briefing Paper # 4
Oliver Letwin, MP exposes the EU Constitution

The Bruges Group continues to expose the proposed EU Constitution: Briefing Paper # 3
Subsidiarity and the Illusion of Democratic Control

The Bruges Group continues to expose the proposed EU Constitution: Briefing Paper # 2
Giscard's draft: A Constitution to destroy Europe

Launch of the Bruges Group's Exposing the EU Constitution Briefing Paper # 1
The EU Constitution: It is a muddle. It is dangerous. It is not for us.

The PM will not let the people decide
Response to the Prime Minister’s speech

Missed opportunites, lost vetos
Tony Blair makes his century: The Prime Minister has handed over to Brussels 100 ways to say ‘No’
Dr Lee Rotherham 

The EU is a thing of the past, Britain and like minded allies should make it that way
Statement on the final draft of the EU Constitution
Robert Oulds 

The draft EU Constitution is the 1970s response to the problems of the 50s and 60s
Tony Blair must not surrender Britain’s democracy to gain favour with Europe’s political class

The EU threat to Britain's criminal law
The Rt Hon. Oliver Letwin MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Home Affairs, to address the Bruges Group

Brown was unconvincing
Response to Gordon Brown's euro statement
The Rt Hon. Lord Lamont of Lerwick 

It's the politics...stupid
The forthcoming announcement on the euro:

A centralised, remote EU Government
The latest draft EU Constitution: Obscure Eurospeak hides serious consequences for Britain

Free speech, the EU Constitution and the Charter of Fundamental Rights
Launch of Bruges Group paper Free Speech: The EU Version

The EU Arrest Warrant
The Extradition Bill
Robert Oulds 

30 years of hurt
30 years of membership of the European Union – 30 years of hurt
Robert Oulds 

Bruges Group supports Iain Duncan Smith
Statement supporting Iain Duncan Smith, MP as leader of the Conservative Party

The lessons of the ERM for Britain and the euro
Britain and the euro ten years after the ERM – is history repeating itself?
The Rt Hon. Lord Lamont of Lerwick 

EMBARGOED UNTIL MIDNIGHT 19th June 2002
European politicians speak-out to support the fight against EU propaganda

EMBARGOED until midnight 18th June 2002
The Brussels propaganda machine

EMBARGOED UNTIL 10.30am Tuesday 18th June 2002
Press conference launching latest paper No. 45

Statement by the Rt Hon. Lord Lamont of Lerwick on the EU’s celebration of Europe Day – 9th May
No Reason To Celebrate

Launch of New Paper No. 44
Democracy in Crisis: The White Paper on European Governance by Nigel Farage, MEP

Euro statement by the Rt Hon. Lord Lamont of Lerwick
“Rejoice, rejoice, rejoice that we are not part of it.
The Rt Hon. Lord Lamont of Lerwick 

The EU bureaucracy, a culture mired in scandals, corruption and nepotism – a stark warning for the peoples of Europe
Launch of paper No. 43

Dr. John Hulsman - Heritage Foundation, Washington D.C. at the Bruges Group’s International Conference, November 2001
Alternatives to the European Union

Britain and Europe: The Culture of Deceit by Christopher Booker
Launch of new paper No. 42

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 2nd October 2001
Response to the Prime Minister's speech: Tony Blair Can Not Win A Euro Referendum

Terrorist attack on US | Election of Conservative Leader
September's political events

Stop-Ken-Clarke-Campaign: For Immediate Release: 20th August 2001
Leadership election: Bruges Group Attack Ken Clarke

Clarke’s Proposed Fudge of the Euro Issue Will Take the Conservative Party Back to the Divisions of the Major Era
Statement on the Conservative leadership election

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 9th June 2001
Nice Treaty – Irish Referendum Result Vindicates Bruges Group

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 10th April 2001
The Metric Martyr Judgement - The Constitutional Implications

Release date: 20th October 2000
Danish vote: Who do you think you are kidding Mr Blair?

Release date: 29th September 2000
Danish vote: Bruges Group Vindicated!

Extracts of a speech to the Bruges Group on the Treaty of Nice
The Nice Treaty
The Rt Hon. John Redwood MP 

Launch of Latest Paper No. 40 by Martin Holmes
William Hague's European Policy