Comparing the EU and the US
response to climate alarmism
A Lesson in Democracy
Jeremy Nieboer
The latest Bruges Group research
by Jeremy Nieboer reviews the present state of scientific opinion on the
existence of any abnormal rise in temperature of the planet and the part, if
any, that man made emissions of CO2 can with confidence be said to have
contributed to it. The four successive reports of the UN Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the UK’s own Stern Review suggest that
climate change may well cause serious loss of global GDP by the end of this
century with catastrophic tipping points likely to occur in 10 to 15 years
time. However, examination of the evidence for these alarming conclusions
indicates that they are riven with deep uncertainties. Not only is the body of
scientific data as to the existence of global warming at best equivocal but
there is also now clear and disturbing evidence of distortions and suppression
of evidence by leading proponents of the case for global warming.
A
Lesson in Democracy also examines how the EU has taken upon itself the
role of championing the ‘Fight against Climate Change’, recognising that
public alarm at the perceived perils mankind is facing could be turned to
account in extending its powers and standing. In doing so it has ignored the
serious doubts cast over the IPCC and Stern reports and has set targets for
cuts in CO2 emissions and for ‘renewable’ energy supply such that irreparable
damage would be done to its subject economies were they to be fully
implemented.
The paper traces the progress of the EU’s policy making in line with each of
these reports and demonstrates that no process of democratic oversight or
investigation has preceded its decisions. It has simply relied without
question on the flawed IPCC reports and the Stern Review. It has not initiated
any independent research into or analysis of the scientific basis of the case
for global warming or the proportionate response that should be made. The
paper contrasts this with the rigorous process of enquiry and research set on
foot over 20 years by successive US Congressional Committees into every aspect
of the subject and concludes that it is only to a robust and effective
democracy that such decisions can safely be committed.
This is the enduring lesson of the global warming alarm.
Montgomery and the Battle of the Bulge Knife
Edge Robert Oulds
Rejecting the EU's regulatory
instrument Saying
No to the Single Market Ruth Lea
Barry Legg
Dr Andrew Lilico
Ian Milne
Professor David Myddelton
Professor Jean-Jacques Rosa
Founder President: The Rt Hon. the Baroness Thatcher of
Kesteven, LG, OM, FRS President: The Rt Hon. the Lord Tebbit of Chingford, CH,
PC Vice-President: The Rt Hon. the Lord Lamont of Lerwick,
Chairman: Barry Legg Director: Robert Oulds MA, Head of
Research: Dr Helen Szamuely, Washington D.C.
Representative: John O'Sullivan CBE Founder Chairman: Lord Harris of High Cross,
Former Chairmen: Dr Brian Hindley, Dr Martin Holmes &
Professor Kenneth Minogue