The Bruges Group spearheaded the intellectual battle to win a vote to leave the European Union and, above all, against the emergence of a centralised EU state.

NOTE! This site uses cookies and similar technologies.

If you not change browser settings, you agree to it. Learn more

I understand

Cookies are a technology which we use to provide you with tailored information on our website. A cookie is a piece of code that is sent to your internet browser and is stored on your system.

Please see below for a list of cookies this website uses:

Cookie name: _utma, _utmb, _utmc, _utmz

Purpose: Google Analytics cookies. Google Analytics is software that lets us analyse how visitors use our site. We use this information to improve our website and provide the best experience to visitors.

Function: These cookies collect data in an anonymous form. Please see Google's privacy policy for further information. To opt out of these cookies, please visit Google's website.

Cookie name: Sitecore

Purpose: Stores information, such as language and regional preferences, that our content management system (the system we use to update our website) relies on to function.

Function: This is a session cookie and will be destroyed when you close your browser. This cookie is essential for our website to function.

Cookie name: ASP.net_session

Purpose: Allows the website to save your session state across different pages. For example, if you have completed a survey, the website will remember that you have done so and will not ask you to complete it again when you view another page on the website.

Function: This is a session cookie and will be destroyed when you close your browser. This cookie is essential for our website to function.

Cookie name: website#sc_wede

Purpose: Indicates whether the user's browser supports inline editing of content. This indicates whether our content management system will work for our website administrators in their internet browsers.

Function: This is a session cookie and will be destroyed when you close your browser. This cookie is essential for our website to function.

Cookie name: redirected

Purpose: Remembers when the site forwards you from one page to another, so you can return to the first page. For example, go back to the home page after viewing a special 'splash' page.

Function: This is a session cookie, which your browser will destroy when it shuts down. The website needs this cookie to function.

Cookie name: tccookiesprefs

Purpose: Remembers when you respond to the site cookie policy, so you do not see the cookie preferences notice on every page.

Function: If you choose to remember your preference with a temporary cookie, your browser will remove it when you shut it down, otherwise the cookie will be stored for about a year.

Cookie name: _ga

Purpose: Additional Google Analytics cookie. Google Analytics is software that lets us analyse how visitors use our site. We use this information to improve our website and provide the best experience to visitors.

Function: These cookies collect data in an anonymous form. Please see Google's privacy policy for further information.

Cookie name: SC_ANALYTICS_GLOBAL_COOKIE, SC_ANALYTICS_SESSION_COOKIE

Purpose: Sitecore Analytics is software that lets us analyse how visitors use our site. We use this information to improve our website and provide the best experience to visitors.

Function: These cookies collect data in an anonymous form. When you close your browser, it will delete the 'session' cookie; it will keep the 'global' cookie for about one year.

Facebook cookies

We use Facebook 'Like' buttons to share site feedback. For further information, see Facebook's cookie policy page.

Twitter cookies

We use Twitter 'Tweet' buttons to share site feedback. For further information, see Twitter's privacy statement.

YouTube cookies

We embed videos from our official YouTube channel. YouTube uses cookies to help maintain the integrity of video statistics, prevent fraud and to improve their site experience. If you view a video, YouTube may set cookies on your computer once you click on the video player.

Cookies pop-up

When you close the cookies pop-up box by clicking "OK", a permanent cookie will be set on your machine. This will remember your preference so that the pop-up doesn't display across any pages whenever you visit the website.

Opting out/removing cookies

To opt out of Google Analytics cookies, please visit Google’s website.

You can also control what cookies you accept through your internet browser. For details on how to do this, please visit aboutcookies.org. Please note that by deleting our cookies or disabling future cookies you may not be able to access certain areas or features of our website.

mailing list
donate now
join now
shop

Bruges Group Blog

Spearheading the intellectual battle against the EU. And for new thinking in international affairs.

IF

How will the word 'if' be powerful in the context of the EU and Brexit negotiations? As Philip II of Macedon found out, sometimes there are battles that brute force will not win. Battles where threats and punishment do not work against a counterpart. Philip II of Macedon had defeated numerous enemies when he sent the following warning message to ancient Sparta:

You are advised to submit without further delay, for if I bring my army into your land, I will destroy your farms, slay your people, and raze your city. (my emphasis)

The Spartans gave a humorous, but defiant reply: If.

With two letters, the Spartans sent a message that has gone down in history. History is full of classic examples not only of successful defiance, but of mistakes made when and where elites have underestimated their opposition and its obvious strength. Hannibal? Spartacus? The 300?

History is also full of voids. Spaces that have been created through tyranny, in response filled naturally. Once the Nazis had been driven out of Eastern Europe, the Soviets filled the inevitable gap. As also happened after war in Iraq the void was filled by Daesh. Once a political or military void is created in the EU something must inevitably fill it. We can sincerely ask, what will replace the UK in the EU? Should the EU be worried? Which country can match the UK economy, intelligence or military prowess? What new member could be enticed to join to cover the losses to the EU? A simple question. Who?

Michel Barnier and Guy Verhofstadt have displayed no concerns in this regard with unrelenting pressure on the UK government in public. It is as if neither has heard of either Iraq or Sparta. It is as if the previous mistakes made by historic figures have not had the lessons learned by their modern counterparts.

It is undeniable that the EU had 2 long years to put a credible deal on the table before the vote on 23 June 2016. If such a deal had been in place would the UK have voted by majority to leave? Until now the EU moderates have been silent. Places like Poland and Hungary have had enough though of being told like some MPs are told by party whips – what to do. The UK has become a joke to some, but a guiding light to others. The EU needs to understand that the vote was not IF we leave, but when.

The UK is being encouraged like Sparta to submit to the EU way of negotiations and presumably to quote Philip II, 'without further delay.' Yet, delays are upon us and not by our own choosing. The EU has declared publicly that it is not willing to discuss trade until the divorce bill is settled. However, we are not faced with being wiped out like Sparta. We are not at war (despite what some mainstream media infer) with the EU. We have not sent any messages with veiled threats like Philip II of Macedon. We have simply employed the right of the democratic majority to have their say on issues that affect them directly.

At the moment, history awaits both sides and their actions will be judged just as closely as the letter sent from Philip II. Although, the EU and UK cannot control how history will see them. Despite obvious propaganda mechanisms being in play, neither has that power.

It has been over a year since the UK voted to leave the European Union. The vote to leave is a recorded fact that some critics wish to reject/ignore. Had voters known X, Y or Z then they would have voted to stay they argue? Others have said IF there is another vote the count would be different. Yet, Article 50 (as set by the EU) has been triggered. There simply is no IF about it.


EU will end like the Holy Roman Empire
The Brexit Legacy
 

Comments 1

Guest - J Fox-Davies on Saturday, 14 October 2017 18:27

If the EU leaders had understood and acted on the UK's concerns when David Cameron discussed these with them.
If the EU elite understood the limits of their remit.
If the UK walked away, paying as much as is legally required ie zero.

If the EU leaders had understood and acted on the UK's concerns when David Cameron discussed these with them. If the EU elite understood the limits of their remit. If the UK walked away, paying as much as is legally required ie zero.
Already Registered? Login Here
Guest
Sunday, 17 December 2017